结肠镜检查前3种肠道准备方法的效果比较  

The comparision of effectiveness of methods between three types bowel preparation before coloscopy

作　　者：刘海英[1] 李亚[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省无锡市第二人民医院神经内科,214002

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2008年第33期3444-3446,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的探讨结肠镜检查前3种肠道准备方法的效果。方法将90例全结肠镜检查病人按随机数字表法分为3组各30例，A组为口服蕃泻叶导泻组，B组为多次大量不保留灌肠组，C组为结肠灌洗组。观察肠道准备过程中病人的耐受性、检查中肠道清洁度以及检查结束后2h血电解质情况。结果3组病人在肠道清洁度、对操作的耐受性、是否存在电解质紊乱等方面的差异具有显著性统计学意义，C组效果明显优于A，B两组。结论结肠灌洗法快速简便、效果好、副作用小，适用面较广，尤其适用于急诊行结肠镜检查的病人。Objective To explore the effectiveness of metnods between three types bowel preparation before coloscopy. Methods 90 patients received coloscopy were divided into three groups （30 cases respectively ） according to the method of random digits table. The patients were recerved FoliumSennae in group A, nonretentiorl enema in group B, and colonic lavage in group C. The patients＇ tolerance, cleaning validity of intestinal tract and electrolyte after 2 hours examination were observed. Results There were significant difference in terms of the patients＇ tolerance, clearing validity of intestinal tract and electrolyte after 2 hours examination among three groups, those in group C showed better than the other two groups. Conclusions Colonic lavage represents advantages in respect to its quickness, convience, good effect, small adverse, and wide application, especially for patients received coloscopy in emergency room.

关 键 词：结肠镜检查 清洁肠道 结肠灌洗 护理 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]