检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京密云县医院普外一科,北京101500 [2]北京中日友好医院肛肠科
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2009年第1期50-52,共3页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为比较两种手术方法治疗环状混合痔的临床效果,采用小切口分段外剥内扎,配合芍倍注射液注射治疗环状混合痔94例,与传统外剥内扎配合消痔灵注射法治疗环状混合痔58例进行对比。结果显示,治疗组治愈率、平均愈合时间、平均痔核萎缩时间、肛门局部不良反应发生率等各项观察指标均优于对照组。结果表明,小切口分段外剥内扎配合芍倍注射治疗环状混合痔安全有效,并发症少。For the objective of comparing the curative effects of two therapies for circumferential mixed hemorrhoids,authors divided 152 cases into treatment group( n =94 cases) and controlled group( n =58 cases) and performed mini-incision segmental procedure of external dissection & internal ligation plus Shaobei solution injection for treatment group and traditional procedure combined with Xiaozhiling injection for controlled group in respectively. As results, in curative rate, average healing time, average atrophy time of hemorrhoid,incidence of anal adverse reaction, etc treatment group was all better to controlled group. These indicate that mini-incision segmental procedure plus Shaobei solution injection is safe and effective and of less complication in the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229