检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:费长山[1]
出 处:《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第1期36-42,共7页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:劳动法律法规的逐步完善和劳动者劳动法律意识的迅速提高,是今后一段时期我国劳动关系向着积极方向变化的基本因素,但这并不意味着劳动争议的减少。每一种处理劳动争议的模式都有其可取也都有其局限之处。多元化处理劳动争议是一个无可争辩的发展趋势。文章认为,建立跨企业社区劳动争议协商机构,建立区域性专业化调解组织,精简仲裁和诉讼程序,构建劳动公益诉讼制度,创新劳动监察机制等是完善各种模式、建立和谐的劳动关系的必要举措。Gradual improvement of the labour law and regulations and rapid enhancement of employees' legal awareness constitute the basic factors for positive changes of our country' s labor relationship in the forthcoming period. However, this doesn' t mean that there are fewer labour disputes. Each labor dispute settlement model has its merits as well as its limits. It is a non - controversial trend to settle labor disputes in different ways. The author suggests a number of necessary measures with which we can improve various models and establish harmonious labor relations. The author argues for the establishment of cross - enterprise labour consultative organizations, for the setting up of regional professional meditative organizations, for the simplification of procedures of arbitration and litigation, for the building up of a labour litigation system for public interests, and for the creatition of a labor surveillance system.
关 键 词:劳动争议 处理模式 中华人民共和国劳动争议调解仲裁法
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229