SPS壁垒的评判标准探讨  

On Criteria for SPS Measure or SPS Barrier

作　　者：董银果[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2009年第1期1-9,共9页International Business Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(70873082);国家软科学基金(2007GX3D082);商务部与中加小农项目基金

摘　　要：文章解析了SPS兴起的经济学基础,梳理了SPS措施与技术性贸易措施及绿色贸易措施的关系,进而根据WTO相关规则原创性地提出了评判正当SPS措施的8条标准,并且分析了这些标准背后隐藏的问题。文章提出,我国针对SPS措施和SPS壁垒应采取不同的应对策略:积极"遵从"国际贸易中正当的SPS措施;向WTO争端解决机制"申诉",运用法律和谈判手段解决SPS壁垒;对于我国和其他发展中国家面临的客观"SPS壁垒",国际组织应尽快澄清SPS协议中的模糊规定,提高SPS协议的执行度;同时,国际组织和发达国家要积极援助发展中国家,提高他们的遵从能力,发展中国家也要积极主动参与国际标准的制定,从游戏规则的被动接受者转变为制定者。This paper expiained clearly the difference of Sanitary and Phytosanitary （SPS） measure, TBT （technical barrier for trade） measure, and green barrier, SPS measure and SPS barrier. Then it presented originally the eight criteria for judging SPS barriers. Based on these, the paper gave the different options for SPS measures and SPS barrier, i.e. WTO members should comply with the qualified SPS measures and try to settle the SPS barrier by negotiation and lawsuit. However, for the objective SPS ＂barrier＂, which the developing countries have been meeting in trade, the international organization and developed countries should solve it mainly by technical assistance.

关 键 词：SPS措施 SPS壁垒 评判标准 遵从成本 

分 类 号：F743[经济管理—国际贸易]