对华反补贴价格比较基准:基于美国和加拿大案例的比较研究  

Price Comparison Benchmark in CVD cases against China: A Comparative Study on U.S and Canada

作　　者：张斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]东华大学

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2009年第1期10-16,共7页International Business Research

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"‘非市场经济’国家与多边贸易体制的政治经济关系研究"(项目编号:06CGJ008)

摘　　要：反补贴与反倾销相似,同样存在价格比较及其基准的确定问题。本文通过考察目前两个主要对中国进行反补贴调查的国家——美国和加拿大的立法和实践,发现两国确定反补贴价格比较基准的一般法律原则显著不同。在此前提下,在对华反补贴实践中还存在以下两个差异:一是在外部基准还是国内基准适用问题上的基本待遇不同,二是价格比较基准确定的具体操作程序不同。但同时,两国在对华反补贴价格比较基准问题上存在一个共同点,即是否适用外部基准取决于各自对中国市场经济地位的认定或在同一产品反倾销调查中的市场导向产业认定。这一共同点可能成为其他WTO成员今后启动对华反补贴调查时决定是否采用外部基准的依据。In countervailing duty （CVD） investigation, just like anti dumping investigation, there exists an issue of price comparison and benchmark selection. The paper analyzes of the regulations and practices of the U.S. and Canada, two WTO members which initiated CVD investigations against China, and finds that the two countries have different legal principles behind the CVD benchmark determination. Besides, in the cases against China, we find that they offer different treatment towards China concerning the external benchmark applicability and follow different procedures regarding benchmark selection and price comparison. But there is one thing in common： whether the external benchmark or the internal benchmark is applied to China rests on whether China＇ s market economy status or market-oriented industry is determined in the relevant antidumping investigation. This is probably an important base on which other WTO members will decide the external benchmark applicability when they initiate CVD investigation against China in the future.

关 键 词：反补贴 价格比较 基准 

分 类 号：F744[经济管理—国际贸易] D922.295[经济管理—产业经济]