检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁行政学院,辽宁沈阳110000
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2009年第1期48-49,共2页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:本文仅就普通程序简化审这一新的法庭审理程序之不足及完善初步探析。文章从简化审的含义及适用法律依据为切入点,简要剖析其存在的不足,着重论述了这一程序的完善;将简化审由"两院一部"的《意见》提升为《刑事诉讼法》所涵盖内容以加强其法律效力,立法的内容应更为充实和完善,司法程序中要体现对被告人权利的保障。通过简化审程序的完善,较好地解决刑事审判中的公平与效率问题,为社会和谐创建良好的法律环境。This article explored to the deficiency and improvement of the simplification of the trial in general process. The article takes the meaning and application of the simplification as the breakthrough point, has a brief analysis of the shortcomings of its existence, and focuses on improving the process; Upgrade the simplification of the trial from the "opinion" of "a House of Representatives" to the content covered by "the Code of Criminal Procedure" in order to strengthen its legal effect. Legislation should be more substantial and perfect; the judicial process should be reflected on the protection of the rights of the accused. Through the improvement of simplifying trial procedures, better solve the fairness and efficiency of a criminal trial and create a good legal environment for social harmony.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38