检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2009年第1期54-55,共2页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
摘 要:目的:对国产与进口阿德福韦酯治疗拉米夫定耐药的慢性乙型肝炎进行经济学研究,选择最佳治疗方案。方法:对拉米夫定耐药的慢性乙型肝炎患者68例,随机分为两组,分别给予国产阿德福韦酯胶囊10 mg及进口阿德福韦酯片10 mg,每日1次,48周后观察临床疗效,运用药物经济学的最小成本分析、成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果:两组临床疗效无显著性差异,但两组药物成本有显著差异。结论:治疗拉米夫定耐药的慢性乙型肝炎,国产阿德福韦酯胶囊有经济学优势。OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pharmacoeconomic study on homemade versus imported Adefovir Dipivoxil in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to Lamivudine so as to optimize the therapeutic scheme. METHODS: A total of 68 patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to Lamivudine were randomly assigned to receive homemade Adefovir Dipivoxil Capsule (10mg) or imported Adefovir Dipivoxil Tablet (10mg) qd for 48 weeks. Then cost-minimization analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted to compare the pharmacoeconomic efficacy between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy but was in drug cost between the two groups. CONCLUSION : The homemade Adefovir Dipivoxil Capsule had the pharmacoeconomic advantages over the imported Adefovir Dipivoxil Tablet in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to Lamivudine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145