检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州中医药大学针灸推拿学院,广东广州510405
出 处:《辽宁中医杂志》2009年第2期264-266,共3页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医临床诊疗技术整理与研究项目(2003ZL51)
摘 要:目的:比较穴位埋线结合中西药法与针灸结合中西药法治疗支气管哮喘的临床效果。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,将哮喘病人分为试验组与对照组,试验组采用穴位埋线法结合中西药;对照组使用针灸结合中西药方法。结果:试验组总有效率92.3%,对照组总有效率为84.6%,P<0.05。提示:试验组疗效优于对照组。穴位埋线结合中西药的疗法治疗支气管哮喘的临床效果优于针灸结合中西药的治疗疗法。Objective : Compare the clinical effects of Point Embedding Therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine with Acupuncture Therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine, to research a better therapy for healing bronchial asthma. Methods : By taking the foreseeing stochastic comparative method, separate the patients into testing group and comparative group. The testing group takes Point Embedding Therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine while the comparative group takes Acupuncture therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine. Results : The effective rate of the 91 patients of the testing group is 92. 3% while the 91 patients of the comparative group is 84. 6%. The statistics difference is abundant( P 〈 0.05) ,which means the healing effect of the testing group is better than the comparative group. Conclusion:Point Embedding Therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine is a better therapy in clinic effect than Acupuncture therapy combined with traditional Chinese and western medicinein healing bronchial asthma.
分 类 号:R244.8[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222