检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安政治学院军事法学系,陕西西安710068
出 处:《时代法学》2009年第1期85-90,共6页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:作为对部分较重犯罪军人和预备役人员的一种处罚,剥夺军衔一直伴随着我国军衔制度的实行而在实践中适用。然而,由于立法规制上的矛盾和缺陷,使我国剥夺军衔在适用性质上一直存在争论,在适用对象上也不尽合理,这已经在一定程度上影响到剥夺军衔的实施效果。如何解决这一问题,本文通过我国剥夺军衔的立法现状考察及适用性质和适用对象分析,提出了应当将剥夺军衔明确规定为一种只对部分较重犯罪的现役军人和预备役军官适用的附加刑,纳入《中华人民共和国刑法》等立法建议。As one kind of major punishment for guilted-soldiers and reserve personnel,the military rank deprivation is accompanying with the development of the system of military rank. But because of the contradictions and defects on legislation ,there are much controversy on the legal status and the suitable objects of the military rank deprivation, which has made a influence on the implementation effect of the the military rank deprivation. This article based on the analysis on the present legislative situation and the suitable objects of the military rank deprivation, suggests that the military rank deprivation should be the part of the criminal law as a accessory punishment and the military rank deprivation should be only implemented on the felony of the soldiers and reserve officers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249