侵权责任法应与物权法相衔接  

Tort Liability Law Should be Connected with Property Law

作　　者：崔建远[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2009年第1期139-144,共6页China Legal Science

摘　　要：我国物权法第37条规定的侵害物权所生损害赔偿的请求权,不是物权请求权,也不宜作为物权请求权的从请求权,而应作为侵权损害赔偿请求权,有时适用于一般侵权行为场合,有时适用于特殊侵权行为场合,有时单独作为侵权损害赔偿的请求权基础,有时须与有关规定一起作为请求权基础。我国物权法第242条、第244条关于无权占有场合侵害物权所生损害赔偿的规定,可作为第37条的特别规定。我国制定侵权责任法必须注意与物权法第37条、第242条和第244条的规定相衔接。The damage claim stipulated in 37th article of China＇s Property Law wnlcn cowe out of tort on property is not a property claim and should not be a sub - claim of property claim but should be considered as a damage claim based on tort. It applies to general tort context as well as some special tort context, and sometimes it can be applied as independent base of tort damage claim and in other cases can be a base combined with other stipulations. The 242nd and 244th articles of the said law can be considered as special regulation of 37th article. The promulgation of tort liability law must be reconciled with above-mentioned articles.

关 键 词：侵害物权 一般侵权行为 特殊侵权行为 侵权损害赔偿 侵权责任法 物权法 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D923.2[政治法律—法学]