论竞争法中的法定赔偿:制度变迁个案的解剖——基于不正当竞争案例的整理与研究  

Legal Compensation in Competition Law

作　　者：李友根[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2009年第1期145-162,共18页China Legal Science

基　　金：司法部2007年度国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目"我国民法实效制度创新研究"的部分研究成果;课题编号07SFB1007

摘　　要：《反不正当竞争法》第20条规定了反不正当竞争案件中损害赔偿额的计算方法,但是对于既无充分证据证明原告损失、也无法认定被告所得的情况,没有相应的规定。司法实践中,为了解决此类案件,法院进行了各种探索,并逐渐确立了定额赔偿的制度。但此种制度一直受到合法性的困扰。在商标法、著作权法以及专利法明确规定法定赔偿金制度后,反不正当竞争法中确立此种制度也势在必行。而法学理论界对这一制度变迁未能提供相应的理论支持与关注,是法学研究值得总结的教训。本文通过对我国司法案例的类型化整理与系统考察,对这一制度变迁过程进行了研究。Although the Article 20 of ＂Law of the People~ Republic of China Against Unfair Competition＂ obtains the method of calculating the compensation for the damage in the unfair competition cases; there is no regulation under the circumstances when it is hard to estimate either the losses of plaintiffs or the profits derived from the infringement by defendants. In the judicial practice, courts tried to seek the way to resolve those cases and gradually established a system of setting a fixed compensation ; but this system has the problem of legality. After the establishment of legal compensation system in the areas of Trademark Law, Copyright Law and Patent Law, it is imperative to set this legal compensation system in the area of Against Unfair Competition Law. However, the legal theory circle doesn＇t pay enough attention or give support to this system changing which should be learned through legal research. This thesis does research on this system changing through organizing and reviewing the related judicial cases.

关 键 词：不正当竞争 定额赔偿 法定赔偿 制度变迁 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学] F832[政治法律—法学]