微波与电熨治疗子宫颈糜烂疗效比较  

A comparison of microwave tissue coagulation and electrocoagulation in treatment of cervical erosion

作　　者：张师前[1] 康曼华[1] 石素英[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东医科大学附属医院妇科

出　　处：《中华理疗杂志》1998年第2期84-85,共2页Chinese Journal of Physical Therapy

摘　　要：目的：评价微波与电熨治疗子宫颈糜烂的临床效果。方法：２６８例慢性宫颈炎患者分为微波组织凝固治疗，频率２４５０ＭＨｚ，电流强度８０ｍＡ，持续作用２～３秒；电熨治疗，电流强度４０～６０ｍＡ，热斑直径５ｍｍ。结果：微波治疗组１次治愈率为９２．２％，电熨组为７９．８％，差异有非常显著性。两组治疗后的不良反应基本相同，微波组术中出血率为３．９％，电熨组为２３．７％，差异有非常显著性。结论：微波组织凝固技术治疗宫颈糜烂，１次治愈率高，术中止血效果好，操作简单，有临床实用价值。Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of microwave tissue coagulation(MTC) and electrocoagulation (EC) in treatment of cervical erosion.Methods: 268 patients with cervical erosion were allocated to MTC(n=154) and EC(n=114).All the patients were averagely followed up for 11 weeks (ranged from 8￣12weeks).Results:142 of 154 patients treated with MTC and 91 of 114 patients treated with EC were cured after treatment.The cured rate was 92.2%and 79.8% respectively.There was a significant difference.During the operation,the bleeding occurred in 6 cases of MTC group(3.9%) and 27 of EC group(23.7%).Conclusions:MTC has a higher cure rate and less complications,and it is a save and effctive therapy for cervical erosion.

关 键 词：宫颈糜烂 微波 电熨 治疗 MTC 

分 类 号：R711.320.5[医药卫生—妇产科学]