从“许霆案”看我国刑法解释权的分配  

Research on Distribution Pattern of Interpretation Power of Criminal Law from "Xu Ting Case"

作　　者：王宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430060

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第3期138-143,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要："许霆案"作为一个"浓缩了司法积年弊端的典型样本",折射出来的问题是多方面的,而刑法解释权分配模式的弊端是这些问题出现的深层次根源。刑法解释权分为立法解释权和司法解释权,立法解释权设计上的局限使得立法解释面临虚设的危险,不仅受到司法解释权扩张的威胁,而且其内部也有分权的趋势。司法解释权被"两高"垄断,限制了司法解释建议的来源,造成裁判权与法律解释权的分离。＂Xu Ting Case＂ ,a typical sample of judicial disadvantages, reflects various problems,and the disadvantages of distribution pattern of interpretation power of criminal law are the profound reasons of these problems. Interpretation power of criminal law includes legislative interpretation power of criminal law and judicial interpretation power of criminal law. Legislative interpretation power of criminal law faces the nominal dangerous which is threatened by judicial interpretation power of criminal law outstretches and is decentralization trend inside. Judicial interpretation power of criminal law, which is monopolized by Supreme People＇ s Court and Supreme People＇ s Procuratorate, limits the source of suggestion of judicial interpretation and causes separation of judgment power and interpretation power of criminal law.

关 键 词：刑法解释权 立法解释权 司法解释权 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]