美、德、日实施宪法公共利益条款之比较研究  

A Cmparative Study on the Implementation of the Public Interest Provisions in the Constitutions in the United States,Germany and Japan

作　　者：褚江丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学法政学院,河北石家庄050051

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第3期160-165,共6页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：河北省科学技术厅项目<我国宪法公共利益原则的特殊性研究>(074072344D)

摘　　要：公共利益问题是各国宪法普遍关注的问题。早在200多年前,美国就将"公共使用"条款写入宪法修正案,德国、日本也分别在各自的宪法中规定了"公共福利"和"公共福祉"等内容。宪政理论与实践证明,公共利益条款的实施并非单纯的法治过程,它总是与本国具体的社会经济制度相联。由于美、德、日三国的市场经济体制存在一定差异性,因而,这些国家关于宪法公共利益条款的实施情况也不尽相同。研究发达国家公共利益条款运行的宪政模式,对于我国实践宪法公共利益原则具有一定的借鉴意义。The public interest problem is the major concern of constitutions in various nations. More than 200 years ago, the public use provision had been written down in the amendment to the United States Constitution . Germany and Japan had also prescribed the public welfare and public well-being provisions in their constitutions respectively. The theories and practices of constitutionalism have proved that the implementation of the public interest provision is not only a pure process of the ruling of law, but it also relates with the specific social economic systems of a certain nation. Because there exists some differences in the marketing economic systems in the United States, Germany and Japan, the implementing conditions of public interest provisions in constitutions in those nations are also different. To study the constitutional modes of the operation of public interest provisions in developed countries will be of referential significance in implementing the public interest principle in our country.

关 键 词：公共利益条款 公共使用 公共福利 公共福祉 

分 类 号：DF391[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]