论我国侵权法中侵害债权类型化之必要性——以一起企业产权纠纷案为例  

The Necessity of Typification of Infringement Contract Debt on the Tort Law

作　　者：郑延海 

机构地区：[1]北京市君致律师事务所,北京100020

出　　处：《山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报》2009年第1期115-117,共3页Journal of Shandong Administrative College and Shandong Economic Management Personnel College

摘　　要：侵害合同债权属于侵权行为中的"侵权之债","合同债权"受到侵犯应当从"侵权法"角度寻找法律基础。从一起"一企二卖"的企业产权纠纷案件可看出,我国目前侵权行为方面的规定太概括,不够明确,造成适用困难,侵害合同债权的侵权行为类型化是我国侵权法立法的必由之路。Infringement contract debt belongs to the ＂tort obligation＂ of infringing act. we should look for the law foundation from the tort law if the contract debt is infringed. At present, rules concerning the tort obligation are not clear, it causes the difficulty of application. So ,the typification of the infringing act of infringement contract debt is the necessary way of Tort Law legislation.

关 键 词：侵权行为法 侵害合同债权 侵权行为类型 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]