检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学海岸与近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《城市勘测》2009年第1期142-146,共5页Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
摘 要:目前国内研究堆石体应力-应变关系特性主要是在常规三轴试验的基础上,对复杂应力路径上堆石体本构模型的验证工作尚不充分。但坝体在填筑期和蓄水期有着明显的应力路径相关性。利用堆石料常规和复杂应力路径大型三轴试验成果,对国内常用的堆石体本构模型——邓肯-张EB模型进行了验证。结果表明,邓肯-张EB模型对常规三轴试验适应性比较好;对复杂应力路径常会夸大堆石体的体积压缩变形,其加卸载准则无法正确判别一些复杂应力路径的加卸载状况。The present studies on stress - strain characteristics of rockfill materials are mainly performed with the conventional triaxial test;and the verification of constitutive model under complex stress path is insufficient. Dam performs stress path correlation where in embankment fill period and storage period. In this paper we use the large scale triaxial test results of rockfill materials under complex stress path, Verification of the commonly used constitutive models -- Duncan - Chang's EB model,The results show that the Duncan - Chang's EB model performs very well under conventional triaxial test but often overestimates the volumetric compression and give incorrect loading- unloading criterion under some complex stress paths.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.10.2