检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨文娟[1] 黄强[1] 畅建霞[1] 孙晓懿[1]
出 处:《水力发电学报》2009年第1期24-30,共7页Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40501011);青海省科技厅资助项目(2004-G-158)
摘 要:为了分析梯级水电站的补偿调节效果,有必要对补偿调节方案进行评价。本文首先针对黄河干流梯级水库电站补偿调节问题,生成了2010、2020水平年的36个补偿调节方案;采用黄河干流梯级水库补偿调节仿真模型,获得了36个方案的补偿调节结果;运用层次分析法建立模型对补偿调节方案进行了评价研究,推荐了最优方案,并对不同水平年初始方案和推荐方案的补偿调节效果进行了系统的对比和分析。结果表明,补偿调节对经济、社会以及生态环境的协调发展是有利的。In order to analyze the compensating effects of the cascade hydropower stations, it is necessary to evaluate the compensating regulation schemes. Aiming at the problem of compensating regulation of cascade reservoirs on the main stream of the Yellow River, the 36 integrated compensating regulation schemes of 2010 and 2020 years are obtained, and the compensating regulation results of those schemes are gained by application of compensating regulation simulation model. In this paper, the evaluation model is built by using AHP in order to evaluate the compensating regulation schemes, and the optimal scheme is introduced. The effects of original and optimal schemes in different years are also compared compensating regulation is favorable to the harmonious and analyzed systematically. The result indicates that the development of economy, society and environment.
关 键 词:水资源 补偿调节 评价 层次分析法(AHP)
分 类 号:TV697.12[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3