两种分娩减痛法的临床效果观察  

Clinical observation on effect of two kinds method of pain relief during delivery

作　　者：李素琴[1] 龚爱敏 郭丽丹[1] 赵冰清[1] 

机构地区：[1]玉环县人民医院,浙江玉环317600

出　　处：《护理与康复》2009年第2期91-92,共2页Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation

摘　　要：目的观察两种分娩减痛法的临床效果。方法2008年1月至2008年6月,有自然分娩意向的待产初产妇100例,分为观察组和对照组各50例。对照组实施麻醉分娩减痛,观察组实施拉玛泽分娩减痛。观察分娩疼痛程度、产程时间及并发症发生数,进行统计学比较。结果两组的产程时间、疼痛程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组并发症发生数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论分娩减痛法可选用拉玛泽分娩减痛法。Objective Observe the clinical effect of two kinds method of pain relief during delivery. Method Divide 100 parturient women with natural delivery intention from January 2008 to June 2008 into observation group and control group e- qually. Observation group receive anaesthesia in delivery and control group receive Lamaza method. Observe the delivery pain level, vaginal delivery time and the cases of complication. Take statistical comparison on the data. Result There is no significant difference in delivery pain level and vaginal delivery time between two groups （P^0.05）. There is significant significant difference in cases of complication （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Delivery pain relief memoth can choose Lamaza method.

关 键 词：拉玛泽分娩减痛 麻醉分娩减痛 效果 

分 类 号：R714.3[医药卫生—妇产科学] R169.42[医药卫生—临床医学]