检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国人兽共患病杂志》1998年第1期17-19,共3页Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
摘 要:目的:为了探讨在生产条件下采用哪种方法来检测抗绿脓杆菌外毒素—A血浆(马)的抗体效价更为可行。方法:本文对小鼠中和试验,双向琼脂扩散试验及胶乳凝集试验进行了比较研究。结果实验显示,小鼠中和试验和双向琼脂扩散试验特异性良好,结果稳定,但前者灵敏度比后者更高。而胶乳凝集试验由于胶乳抗原不易保存,其结果稳定性较差。结论:我们认为小鼠中和试验适用于大规模生产时采用,双向琼脂扩散可作为初步效价的检测。In order to approach which method is the most suitable one in the titre detection of equine anti-Pseudomonas areruginosa exotoxin A plasma. METHOD:Mouse neutralization test. Double immunodiffusion test and latex agglutination reaction were compared RESULTS:The results showed that the mouse neutralization test and double immunodiffusion test have the advantages of good-special and reliable-resuirs,but sensitivity of the former is higher than one of the latter. The results from latex agglutination were unreliable due to latex anigen was preserved uneasy. CONCLUSION: So we sugest that the mouse netralization was best suited for detecting the titre,double immunodiffusion test was available.
分 类 号:R378.991[医药卫生—病原生物学] R446.62[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249