解读柏林犹太人博物馆中霍夫曼花园  

E.T.A.Hoffmann Garden in Berlin Jewish Museum

作　　者：李茗茜[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,硕士研究生200092

出　　处：《华中建筑》2009年第1期45-47,共3页Huazhong Architecture

摘　　要：建筑师丹尼尔·里伯斯金的建筑以其独特的形态学方法、晦涩难懂的建筑内涵、打破常规的大胆构思而被冠以解构主义、观念建筑等"标签"。该文认为只有对建筑师操作手法进行分析,找到隐藏在建筑背后的意图,加以总结归纳,方可运用自如,从而在建筑学习过程中避免复制现有模型和单纯照搬里伯斯金式样,创作出既富内涵和独创性又具可建造性的作品。Daniel Libeskind＇s buildings are marked as “deconstruction” and “conceptual building” due to their unique morphologic methods, obscure meanings and bold ideas off the beaten track. This article considers that only through analyzing the architect＇s operating techniques, finding the intentions behind the buildings, and making induction and conclusion, could the architects practise freely, avoid replicating the existing model and simply copying Libeskind＇s style, and create works possessing rich connotation, originality as well as practicability.

关 键 词：倾斜 笛卡尔坐标系 矛盾 经验几何学 

分 类 号：TU-086[建筑科学—建筑理论]