检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Wang Yan Zheng Junhu Zeng Jiazhi
机构地区:[1]Coll. of Computer Science and Engineering, Univ. of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, P. R. China [2]Coll. of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest Univ. for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China.
出 处:《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》2009年第1期178-184,共7页系统工程与电子技术(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60673142);Applied Basic Research Project of Sichuan Province (2006J13-067)
摘 要:To improve the resource utilization ratio and shorten the recovery time of the shared path protection with differentiated reliability (SPP-DiR) algorithm, an algorithm called dynamic shared segment protection with differentiated reliability (DSSP-DiR) is proposed for survivable GMPLS networks. In the proposed algorithm, a primary path is dynamically divided into several segments according to the differentiated reliability requirements of the customers. In the SPP-DiR algorithm, the whole primary path should be protected, while in the DSSP- DiR algorithm, only partial segments on the primary path need to be protected, which can reduce more backup bandwidths than that in the SPP-DiR algorithm. Simulation results show that the DSSP-DiR algorithm achieves higher resource utilization ratio, lower protection failure probability, and shorter recovery time than the SPP-DiR algorithm.To improve the resource utilization ratio and shorten the recovery time of the shared path protection with differentiated reliability (SPP-DiR) algorithm, an algorithm called dynamic shared segment protection with differentiated reliability (DSSP-DiR) is proposed for survivable GMPLS networks. In the proposed algorithm, a primary path is dynamically divided into several segments according to the differentiated reliability requirements of the customers. In the SPP-DiR algorithm, the whole primary path should be protected, while in the DSSP- DiR algorithm, only partial segments on the primary path need to be protected, which can reduce more backup bandwidths than that in the SPP-DiR algorithm. Simulation results show that the DSSP-DiR algorithm achieves higher resource utilization ratio, lower protection failure probability, and shorter recovery time than the SPP-DiR algorithm.
关 键 词:generalized multiprotocal label switching segment protection differentiated reliability resource uti-lization ratio.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147