三用型水源热泵方案和常规风冷冷水机组加燃油热水锅炉方案的比较  

Comparison Between Three-use Water Source Heat Pump and Conventional Air-cooled Chiller with Hot Water Oil-burning Boiler Schemes

作　　者：郭明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]大连大学建工学院岩土与结构工程技术研究中心,辽宁大连116622 [2]大连五洲建筑设计有限公司,辽宁大连116021

出　　处：《制冷空调与电力机械》2009年第1期82-85,共4页Refrigeration Air Conditioning & Electric Power Machinery

摘　　要：以大连长兴岛高尔夫球场会所为例,根据全年空调负荷、采暖负荷和生活热水负荷,选择了三用型水源热泵方案和风冷冷水机组加燃油热水锅炉方案,并对这两个方案的初投资和运行费用进行了计算;经比较,三用型水源热泵的方案初投资少,运行费用低,是较节能的方案,在地下水源充足的地区应大力推广。Taking Changxing island club of golf course in Dalian as an example,according to whole airconditioning load, heating and hot water load, three-use water source heat pump and air-cooled chiller with hot-water oil-buring boiler schemes were chosen. Then the first investment and operating costs of the two schemes were calculated and compared. The result showed that the former＇s first investment and operating costs was lower and it＇s the energy-saving scheme. So it should be populatized in the areas the ground water source are adequate.

关 键 词：三用型水源热泵 风冷冷水机组 燃油热水锅炉 初投资 运行费用 技术经济比较 

分 类 号：TU831.4[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]