证券虚假陈述赔偿诉讼的创新与评价——最高人民法院《若干规定》有关证券侵权赔偿规定评析  

On the Innovation and Evaluation of the Suit of False Statement of Securities Compensation

作　　者：陈巍[1] 唐晓春[2] 高治国[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872 [2]中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430074 [3]天津地铁总公司,天津300051

出　　处：《现代财经（天津财经大学学报）》2009年第2期77-81,共5页Modern Finance and Economics：Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：教育部重大攻关项目"多元化纠纷解决机制与和谐社会的建构"(05JZDH004)的中期成果

摘　　要：我国证券侵权诉讼的司法解释确立的诉讼形式与我国现行民事诉讼法上的代表人诉讼存在诸多不同,是对代表人诉讼的变通适用,包括取消了代表人诉讼的人数限制、对代表人诉讼进行分割组合、扩展了代表人的权限、取消了立案阶段对诉讼形式的要求等四个方面。以上变通措施具有合理性,可以作为我国改革代表人诉讼的参考。The form of suit defined by the judicial explanation of securities tort in China is different from the representative suit of the existent civil procedure law. It is a flexable application to the representative suit, includes such four aspects as to cancelthe limitation on the numbers of representative suit, to segmentate, to expand the au- thority of representative, and to cancel the demand on form of suit during the period of case registration. All the flexible measures are reasonable, and it can be the reference to reform the representative suit.

关 键 词：证券侵权行为 股东集体诉讼 代表人诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.181[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D923.41[政治法律—法学]