三结构确认胆囊管在预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤中的价值  被引量:6

Value of identification of cystic duct, common bile duct, and common hepatic duct in prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王殿臣[1] 董永红[2] 陈智[2] 武书胜[2] 毕小刚[2] 底卫东[2] 张润福 李占科[4] 孙彦龙[1] 

机构地区:[1]山西煤炭中心医院普外科,太原030006 [2]山西省人民医院普外科 [3]太原晋祠医院普外科 [4]十三冶医院普外科

出  处:《中华医学杂志》2009年第6期406-408,共3页National Medical Journal of China

摘  要:目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中避免医源性肝外胆管损伤的解剖学方法。方法分析1992年3月至2006年5月间施行的LC13190例,其中在1992年3月至1996年5月间施行LC2698例,主要采用辨认胆囊管、胆总管和肝总管的二三管法(即三管组);1996年5月至2006年5月间共施行10492例,其中采用三管法8566例,另外1926例因胆管显露不太容易而采用在胆囊管位置解剖出的管状结构,结合分离Calot三角区中的胆囊淋巴结、胆囊壶腹、胆囊动脉以及胆囊三角区空虚这4项指标中的至少2项,帮助确认胆囊管的三结构确认胆囊管法(即三管+三结构组),分别就两组间的手术时间、中转开腹率、术中出血量及并发症等进行研究。结果13190例患者中无一例发生术中误伤胆管致黄疸、胆瘘等。三管组手术时间15~92min,平均(38±16)min,中转开腹率为8.7%;三管+三结构组手术时间15~52min,平均(28±12)min,中转开腹率为1.8%。两组手术时间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组中转开腹率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。而两组术中出血率和并发症率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论三结构确认胆囊管法不仅可以有效帮助确认胆囊管,避免医源性胆管损伤的发生率,而且可以缩短LC手术时间,降低中转率。Objective To explore effective method to avoid iatrogenic bile duct injury during laparoscopic eholecysteetomy (LC). Methods 10 492 patients underwent LC from May 1996 to May 2006, 8566 of them were treated by the method to identify the cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct during LC (tri-duct method group), and the left 1926 cases whose cystic duct failed to be exposed easily were treated with the method to identify at least two of the 4 structures (cystic lymph node, Hartmann's pouch, cystic artery, and emptiness of cystic triangle) so as to help identify the cystic duct (triduct plus tri-structure group). The operating time, amount of blood loss, open conversion rate, and morbidity were compared between these 2 groups. Results No cases of bile leakage or jaundice because of accidental injury of bile duct were found. The operating time of the tri-duct plus tri-strueture group was (28 ± 12) (15 -52) mix, significant]y shorter than that of the tri-duct group [ (38 ± 16) (15 -92) mix, P 〈0.05]. The open conversion rate of the tri-duet plus tri-strueture group was 1.8% , significantly lower than that of the tri-duct group ( 8.7% , P 〈 0.05 ). There were no significant difference in the amount of blood loss and morbidity between the two groups ( both P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The tri-structure method can not only confirm the cystic duct correctly, thus preventing iatrogenic bile duct injury, but also shorten the operating time and reduce the open conversion ratio during LC.

关 键 词:胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 胆管 创伤与损伤 预防 

分 类 号:R686[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象