不合事体情理是当代小说难出经典名著的重要症结——以著名作家路遥刘庆邦欧阳黔森的三部中篇小说为例(下)  

Unreasonable and False Plots in Contemporary Novels Lead to Few Classical Masterpieces——An Analysis of Three Famous Novelettes[Ⅱ]

作　　者：王志尧[1] 

机构地区：[1]南阳师范学院<南都学坛>编辑部,河南南阳473061

出　　处：《铜仁学院学报》2009年第1期45-50,共6页Journal of Tongren University

摘　　要：当代小说创作的表面繁荣主要体现在数量的庞大上,但在质量方面却很难产生经典名著。仅以路遥的《人生》、刘庆邦的《到城里去》、欧阳黔森的《白多黑少》三部中篇获奖小说为例,其间悖情悖理的虚假失真之处俯拾皆是,大有滥用"戏不够,神仙凑"之胡编乱造的拙劣平庸手法之嫌。从个人方面来说,古典文化功底浅薄限定了往高精尖处发展的空间,在作品中便裸露出捉襟见肘之窘和山穷水尽之憾。从社会因素衡定,则与转型期所普遍存在的浮躁心态挚密相关。急功近利,多写快出,是假冒伪劣顽疾在小说创作领域的真实体现,致使作品情节虚假问题变成了一种习以为常、司空见惯的集体无意识。此项流弊应及早引起文学界领导层和作家们自身的高度重视和认真反思,以便对症下药,制订出切实可行的改革措施,呼唤并敦促新时期文学巨人的早日脱颖而出。The superficial prosperity of contemporary novels is reflected mainly in their large quantities. However, their bad quality makes they are impossible to be masterpiece. Taking three novelettes （Lu Yao＇s Life, Liu Ying-bang＇s Go to Town ＆ O-yang Qian-sen＇s Brightness Rather Than Darkness ） for example, we can find various unreasonable and false details in them, which makes the readers have a suspicion that the writer adopts a clumsy trick to invite immortals to make up the roles. In personal view, a writer＇s meager knowledge of classical culture limits his development, which puts him in awkward straits. As far as social factors are concerned, it is a reflection of impetuous psychology common in transformation period. Eagerness for immediate success and quick production of abundant writings are the true embodiment of the persistent ailment in the field of creation of novels. It makes everyone becomes accustomed to the problem of false plots to . Leaders of literary circles and writers themselves should attach great importance to the problems and try to find out possible solutions. They must work out feasible reform measures to figure the literature giant of new period as soon as possible.

关 键 词：人生 到城里去 白多黑少 小说创作 情节虚假 通病 对策 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]