不同消毒方法对手术室空气消毒的效果比较  

Comparison of Air Sterilization Effect in Operating Room about Different Disinfection Measures

作　　者：蔡彩珠 张玉姬 黄谢红 

机构地区：[1]广东省电白县人民医院,广东电白525400

出　　处：《河北医学》2009年第2期171-173,共3页Hebei Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨不同消毒方法对手术室空气消毒的效果。方法:自2007年1月至2008年1月间分别采用空气洁净器法、过氧乙酸喷雾法以及紫外线灯照射法对3间手术室进行消毒并监测空气消毒效果。结果:空气消毒器法自然菌消除率为94.59%,过氧乙酸喷雾法为89.32%,紫外线灯照射法为81.83%。消毒30min后,空气消毒器法细菌总数明显低于过氧乙酸喷雾法和紫外线灯照射法,自然菌消除率明显高于紫外线灯照射法,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。过氧乙酸喷雾法细菌总数明显低于紫外线灯照射法,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:三种方法均是有效的手术室空气消毒方法,其中空气洁净器使用范围更广泛,使用更方便。Objective： To investigate the effect of air sterilization in operating rooms about different disinfection measures. Method： 3 operating rooms were disinfected by aerpurity appliance, peracetic acid nebulization and ultra- violet lamp irradiation from January in 2007 to January in 2008 respectively, and the effects of air sterilization were detected. Result： The elimination coefficient of physio - bacterium was 94 . 59% in aer- purity appliance , 89.32% in peracetic acid nebulization and 81.83% in ultra -violet lamp irradiation. After 30 minutes, the total sum of bacterium in aer - purity appliance was less than that in peracetic acid nebulization and ultra - violet lamp irradiation, elimination coefficient of physio - bacterium in aer- purity appliance was more than that in peracetic acid nebulization and ultraviolet lamp irradiation,and there was significent difference （ P 〈 0.05 ）. The elimination coefficient of physio - bacterium in peracetic acid nebulization was lower than that in ultra - violet lamp irradiation, and there was signifieent difference between two group（ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion, All 3 kinds of disinfection measures are effective, and aer - purity appliance is used more widely and conveniently.

关 键 词：消毒 手术室 过氧乙酸 紫外线 空气洁净器 

分 类 号：R187.4[医药卫生—流行病学]