检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵静[1] 张仁霞[1] 许冬梅[1] 李菲菲[1]
机构地区:[1]北京回龙观医院护理部,100096
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2009年第3期217-219,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨老年痴呆患者疼痛临床评估方法,以及降低疼痛应激的护理对策。方法将符合诊断标准的40例重度老年痴呆患者随机分为评估组和对照组各20例。在常规静脉采血过程中使用中文版晚期老年痴呆疼痛评估量表(C-PAINAD)进行评分。根据评分给予评估组相应的非药物疼痛处理,对照组不给予任何处理。在疼痛刺激后60min对两组患者再次进行评分。结果两组患者在采血过程中均存在不同程度的疼痛,但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);60min后评分结果比较,评估组明显低于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论重度老年痴呆患者仍能感知到疼痛,根据评分给予相应的非药物处理可减轻其疼痛感。Objective To explore the pain assessment methods of severe senile dementia patients and nursing measures of reducing the pain stress. Methods 40 severe senile dementia patients were randomly divided into assessment group and control group (20 patients per group). Two groups were evaluated by Chinese version of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (C-PAINAD) with routine medical venipuncture, in addition, corresponding non-drug treatments was only given in assessment group Two groups were reevaluated by C-PAINAD 60 minutes later. Results All of the 40 patients had different degree pain during the routine medical treatments , there was no difference between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05 ). The reevaluated scores of assessment group were significantly lower than that of control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions Pains are very common among severe senile dementia patients during the routine medical treatments and can be evaluated by C-PAINAD. Corresponding non-drug treatments could reduce the harmful effects of pain on senile dementia patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.87.133