检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河海大学
出 处:《水利学报》1998年第3期43-47,共5页Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基 金:国家"八五"重点攻关项目
摘 要:本文介绍了防渗墙接头大比尺模型试验,量测了混凝土防渗墙内的应力、廊道与防渗墙之间的相对位移以及填土表面的下沉.试验分空接头、软接头和刚性连接及插入式方案4种情况.对每种试验情况都进行二维和三维有限元计算,并将实测值与计算值对比.空接头防渗墙内应力在试验情况下只有刚性连接的一半,软接头及插入式方案的可减缓墙内应力.三维计算防渗墙应力与实测值符合,二维计算值偏大.Abstract Large scale model tests for junction of concrete watertight wall are carried out. The stress distribution, relative displacement between the wall and corridor and the settlement of earthfill surface are measured. The tests including hollow junction, softened junction, stiff junction and inserted junction. The test results are compared with 2 D and 3 D finite element methods. It shows that the stresses of hollow junction are only one half of those of stiff junction. The stresses of inserted junction and the stresses of the stoff junction are higher than those of softened. The result obtained from 3 D FEM is better than that from 2 D FEM.
分 类 号:TV131.61[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学] TV223.42
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117