检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张萍[1] 梁新丽[1] 廖正根[1] 赵国巍[1] 赖珺[1] 戴春兰[1]
机构地区:[1]江西中医学院现代中药制剂教育部重点实验室,南昌330004
出 处:《江西中医学院学报》2009年第1期33-35,共3页Journal of Jiangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家十一五科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAIO9B07-05);江西省卫生厅中医药科研基金资助项目(2007A018);江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ08327)
摘 要:目的:以水为提取溶剂,比较微波辅助与传统提取对黄芪多糖的影响研究。方法:采用正交实验设计,蒽酮-硫酸比色法测定其含量,优选微波辅助与传统提取黄芪的工艺,比较两种提取工艺对黄芪多糖的影响。结果:优化传统提取条件为料液比12∶1,提取时间60min,提取2次,黄芪多糖提取率为89.34%;微波辅助提取条件为料液比12∶1,提取时间15min,微波功率800W,黄芪多糖提取率为93.02%。结论:微波辅助提取时间短、有效成分提取率高,可用于黄芪多糖的提取工艺。Objective:Comparative study on extracting astragalus-polysaccharose from conventional extraction and microwave-assisted by water. Methods:Orthogonal test was used, Polysaccharide content was determined with anthrone-sulphuric acid colorimetry. Results:The optimum conventional extraction procedure was as fallow: 12 times of water decocting 60 min ,2 times, the polysaccharide extraction rate was 89.34% ;The optimum microwave-assisted extraction procedure was:12 times of water abstraction 15 min, microwave irradiation (800W) 2 times,the extraction rate was 93.02%. Conclusion:The microwave technique could be a better method for polysaccharides extraction in the Radix astragali.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15