检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:储诚富[1] 黄兴怀[2] 仝其波[2] 赵升峰[1]
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,安徽合肥230009 [2]安徽省电力设计院,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第3期403-406,共4页Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40872190);合肥工业大学科学研究发展基金资助项目(080702F)
摘 要:文章对原状土、重塑土和改性粉土的压实性、渗透性等主要防渗垫层指标进行了对比评价,结果表明,原状土和压实重塑土的渗透性不能达到1×10-7cm/s,而改性土具有较好的压实性和低渗透性;提出了该种粉质黏土垫层改性后的最佳掺灰比。A series of experiments on undisturbed and disturbed samples and the silt improved with lime from the north of Anhui Province are performed to evaluate several main indexes including compactibility and permeability. The results show that the silt improved with lime has higher compactibility and lower permeability than undisturbed and disturbed samples, and moreover its permeability can be in the order of 1×10^-7 cm/s when it is compacted under the optimum or near to the optimum water content. Based on the above experiments, optimal lime content of 12% is put forward. The results provide a basis and reference for similar projects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3