早期血液净化治疗对全身炎症反应综合征及脓毒症患者治疗作用的研究  被引量:6

A clinical study on early blood purification in the treatment of patients with SIRS /sepsis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴立峰[1] 李子龙[1] 汪正权[1] 孙成群[1] 

机构地区:[1]浙江省余姚市人民医院,浙江余姚315400

出  处:《现代实用医学》2009年第2期111-113,118,共4页Modern Practical Medicine

摘  要:目的应用连续性血液净化技术(CBP)对全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)及脓毒症(sepsis)患者进行治疗,探讨其对SIRS患者细胞因子及预后的影响。方法37例SIRS患者及25例sepsis患者行连续性血液净化治疗24h,于CBP治疗前0h,CBP治疗后6、12、24、36h,测血清细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-(TNF-)、白介素-1(IL-1)、IL-6,同时观察治疗组CBP前后的APACHEⅡ、血乳酸、胃黏膜动脉血二氧化碳分压差(Pg-aCO2)的变化,并与对照组比较28d存活率。结果接受CBP的SIRS患者TNF-在6、24及36h后,IL-1在36h后以及IL-6在12和36h后明显低于0h(<0.05);;接受CBP的sepsis患者TNF-及IL-636h后明显低于0h(<0.05),IL-1在12、36h后明显低于0h(<0.05);;在36h,治疗组TNF-、IL-1、IL-6水平较对照组明显低(<0.05),SIRS患者在36h的TNF-水平明显低于sepsis患者(<0.05);;治疗组患者APACHEⅡ评分、血乳酸、Pg-aCO2下降(<0.05);;治疗组患者28d存活率明显高于对照组(62.90%26.67.%,<0.05)。结论CBP有良好的清除细胞因子效果,改善SIRS、sepsis患者的预后;;在血液净化选择时机上应尽可能早。Objective To evaluate the effect of continuous blood purification (CBP)on cytokines and prognosis in the treatment of patients with SIRS/sepsis. Methods 37 patients diagnosed as SIRS and25 patients diagnosed as sepsis were treated with continuous blood purification for 24 hours. The serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 in CBP group were detected at 0 h, and 6,12,24,36 h after CBE APACHE Ⅱ, lactate and Pg-aCO2 were also tested. The survival rates of patients were compared between CBP group and control group. Results In SIRS group, the level of TNF-α was significantly lower at 6,24,36 h than that at 0 h( P 〈 0.05); the level of IL-1 was significantly lower at 36 h than that at 0 h(P 〈 0.05), and the level of IL-6 was significantly lower at 12,36 h than that at 0 h(P 〈 0.05). In sepsis group, there was a significant reduction of the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 at 36 h( P 〈 0.05), and the level of IL-6 was significantly lower at 12, 36 h than that at 0 h(P 〈 0.05). At 36 h, there was a significant difference of the levels of TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 between CBP group and control group( P 〈 0.05), and the level of TNF-α was lower in SIRS group than that in sepsis group. After CBP treatment, APACHE Ⅱ, lactate and Pg-aCO2 declined significantly in CBP group(P〈 0.05). Compared with control group, the survival rates of CBP group was higher(62.90% vs 26.67.%,P 〈 0.05). Conclusion CBP is an effective therapy to remove the cytokines and improve the outcome of patients with SIRS/sepsis. The earlier to receiving CBP treatment, the better the outcome is.

关 键 词:血液滤过 脓毒症综合征 免疫法 

分 类 号:R631.1[医药卫生—外科学] R457[医药卫生—临床医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象