检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯东德[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《现代法学》2009年第2期76-82,共7页Modern Law Science
摘 要:公司契约理论的契约自由精神在我国新《公司法》中得到了一定程度的体现。《公司法》提高了授权性规范在条文中的比例,一定程度上扩大了股东及其他公司参与者的自由空间。然而,从公司契约理论的视角来看,我国股东权制度仍然存在一些问题,由此,建议《公司法》修订中应使用规范用语、正确区分强制性规范与任意性规范、进一步减少强制性规范、进一步完善股权转让权制度以及表决权制度。未来的股东权制度有待于建立《公司法》的动态适应机制,以保持《公司法》的高度适应性。China' s new Corporate Act embodies the spirit of freedom of contracting of corporate contraetarainism. As a result, a higher proportion of enabling provisions was attained in the Act and to some extent the freedom of shareholders and other corporate participants was extended. However, in the perspective of contractarainism, there are still some problems in the regime of rights of shareholders. To solve them, it is wise for us to use more specific language in the Act, distinguish compulsory and voluntary norms, norms, and correct and improve share assignment and voting ways. Further, a statutory decrease compulsory dynamic shareholder rights regime is to be established to meet the demands brought about by every possible change.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249