检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学地理系
出 处:《城市问题》2009年第2期2-9,共8页Urban Problems
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(40471029)--微区位研究
摘 要:外资大卖场为了争夺门店资源,不断在我国大中城市扎堆扩张。对上海的研究发现,商业规制不力、超国民待遇、地方政府受利益驱动等助长了外资大卖场的扎堆扩张,导致诸多负面影响,如本土大卖场面临"挤出威胁",本土制造业利润空间萎缩,商业资源浪费,城市交通秩序混乱,周边中小零售商业衰亡等。调控外资大卖场扎堆扩张,关键在于强化商业规制,取消外资大卖场的"超国民待遇",完善商业网点规划。Foreign-funded hypermarkets continue aggregation expansion regardless of costs in China's large and medium-sized cities.A case study on Shanghai shows that a series of factors such as business regulation ineffective,super-national treatment,the local government driven by interest etc.encourage aggregation expansion and bring a lot of negative impact,for instance the extrusion threat to the local hypermarkets,decreasing profit of local manufacture,the waste of business resources,the disorder of urban traffic,the closure of small and medium-sized retail business and so on.It includes that it is necessary to strengthen commercial regulations,improve business planning and cancel super-national treatment in order to regulate and control hypermarket aggregation expansion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229