检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡中心医院泌尿外科,重庆404000 [2]第三军医大学新桥医院泌尿外科,重庆400014
出 处:《吉林医学》2009年第5期405-406,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶术的两种途径对血流动力学和治疗效果的影响。方法:40例患者随机分为两组,分为经腹膜后组和经腹腔组,每组各20例,均采用全麻,分别测定气腹中30min患者的血流动力学、动脉血气分析及手术时间、术后肛门排气时间和住院时间。结果:经腹膜后腔组较经腹腔手术组对患者术中血流动力学和血气的影响较小;手术时间和肛门排气时间明显减少。结论:经腹膜后腔的腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术是安全有效的,较经腹腔的方式更具有优越性。Objective To explore the influence of the two ways of laparoscopic renal cyst unroofing on hemodynamics and therapeutic efficacy. Method Forty operative cases were randomly divided into the retroperitoneoscopic group and the laparoseope group. All cases were applied general anesthesia, and hemodynamics of 30 minutes after CO2 insufflation, arterial blood gas, time of operation, time of anus purge gas and time of hospitalization were measured. Results The less influence of hemodynamies and arterial blood gas were found in the retroperitoneoscopie group, and less time of operation and time of anus purge gas were found in the retroperitoneoseopie group. Conclusion The ways of retroperitoneal laparoseopie renal cyst unroofing is more safe and superior than the way of laparoseopie renal cyst unroofing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28