检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189 [2]湖南省人民检察院,湖南长沙410001
出 处:《河北法学》2009年第4期62-65,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:《政府信息公开条例》的实施,在一定程度上保障了公民的知情权,然而,《条例》在规定知情权法律救济途径时,由于并未充分考虑其独特的性质,故知情权如遭受侵害,在行政复议、行政诉讼、国家赔偿等传统的救济手段中面临诸多困惑与尴尬。因此,在宪法中明确赋予公民知情权以基本权利的地位;待时机成熟提升条例的法律位阶,变条例为法律;调整行政复议、行政诉讼的审查方式,增加屏蔽审理程序;提高公民权利观念,加强政府法治理念,畅通救济途径,才能更加有效地保障公民的知情权。The Government Information Disclosure Bill, to a certain extent, to protect the citizens right to know, however, the "Reg- ulations" in the provision of relief to know the legal way, not due to take full account of its unique nature. It would be subjected to such violations of the fight to know. In the administrative reconsideration, administrative proceedings, the State compensation and other traditional means of relief in the face a lot of confusion and embarrassment. As a result, the constitution clearly gives citizens the right to know as to the status of fundamental rights;when the time is ripe to enhance the Bill hierarchy law, regulations become law; adjustment of administrative reconsideration, administrative review of the proceedings of the way to increase the shielding proceedings ; raise the concept of civil rights,strengthen the government the idea of the rule of law, free way to relief in order to more effectively protect the citizen' s fight to know.
分 类 号:DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80