江苏长江水与苏鲁浙主要地表水VOCs、SVOCs检测  被引量:7

A Comparison of VOCs,SVOCs Contents of Yangtze River Water and Main Surface Water in Jiangsu,Zhejiang and Shandong

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:韩方岸[1] 陈连生[2] 吉文亮[2] 李小娟[2] 周长美[2] 胡云[3] 陆荣柱[1] 将兆峰 杨生 

机构地区:[1]江苏大学食品与生物工程学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]江苏省疾病预防控制中心卫生检测中心 [3]镇江出入境检验检疫局食品卫生处 [4]镇江市疾病预防控制中心环境卫生处 [5]镇江市卫生监督所环境卫生处

出  处:《预防医学情报杂志》2009年第3期161-167,共7页Journal of Preventive Medicine Information

基  金:江苏省预防医学基金项目(Y200718);镇江市社会发展科技计划基金项目(SH2007045)

摘  要:目的了解江苏、山东、浙江地表水VOCs、SVOCs状况,为改进饮水处理工艺,控制环境危险因素提供科学依据。方法于2006-04/05调查江苏、山东、浙江21个主要地表水源,采用P&T-GC-MS,SPME-GC-MS方法检测。结果选择江苏、山东、浙江主要地表水点21个、检测水126份,检测VOCs25项,检出22项,检测SVOCs38项,检出10项,其余指标低于检出限。所检测的水源VOCs、SVOCs指标均低于目前国家评价标准。水源共性污染物有邻苯二甲酸二酯、五氯酚、乐果,特异污染物有阿特拉津、1,2-二氯乙烷等。VOCs阳性率依次为长江水>浙江水源>山东水源>江苏其他水源,阳性率为20.37%、11.89%、7.62%和6.67%,χ2=68.30、15.82、11.79,P<0.01。浙江水源阳性率>江苏地表水源,χ2=12.48,P<0.01。SVOCs阳性率依次为长江水>江苏其他水源>山东水源>浙江水源,SVOCs阳性率分别为13.07%、7.55%、5.56%和4.36%,长江水>浙江水源、江苏其他水源,χ2=27.36、12.74,P<0.01。江苏其他水源>浙江水源,长江水>山东水源,χ2=5.73、4.19,P<0.05。结论江苏、山东和浙江主要地表水源均有不同种类、含量的VOCs、SVOCs被检出,必须加强水源保护和生活饮用水处理。Objective To understand the situation of surface water VOCs, SVOCs in Jiangsu, Shandong and Zhejiang province, so as to provide scientific evidence for improving the drinking water treatment procedure, and controlling environmental risk factors. Methods The condition of surface water in 21 major surface water sources in Jiangsu, Shandong, and Zhejiang province was detected by the P&T-GC-MS, SPME-GC-MS. Results Among the 126 surface water samples in 21 locations in Jiangsu, Shandong and Zhejiang province, VOCs was tested by i5 items, and 22 items were detected; SVOCs was tested in 38 items, and 10 items were detected. The others items were all below the detected limits. The indicators detected in water VOCs, SVOCs were lower than the current national limit standards. The common pollutants of water sources were phthalate esters, pentachlorophenol, rogor; and the specific pollutants were atrazine, 1, 2-dichloroethane, and so on. To order the VOCs positive rates, according to the detected location, the results showed that Yangtze River water 〉 Zhejiang water 〉 Shandong water 〉 other water sources in Jiangsu, with the positive rates of 20. 37%, 11.89%, 7.62% and 6. 67%, respectively (χ^2 = 68.30, 15. 82, 11.79, P 〈0.01 ). The water items positive rate in Zhejiang was higher than that in Jiangsu (χ^2 =12.48, P 〈 0.01). To order the SVOCs positive rates, according to the detected location, the results showed that the Yangtze River water 〉 other sources in Jiangsu 〉 Shandong water 〉 Zhejiang water, with the positive rates of 13.07%, 7.55%, 5.56 % and 4. 36%, respectively. The items positive rate of water in the Yangtze River water was higher than that in Zhejiang and other water sources in Jiangsu (χ^2 = 27.36, 12. 74, P 〈 0. 01 ). The items positive rate of water in other sources in Jiangsu was higher than that in Zhejiang water sources, which in the Yangtze River water. higher than that in Shandong water ( χ^2 = 5.73,4. 19, P 〈 0.05). Conclusions VOCs, SVOCs are detected in dif

关 键 词:饮用水 水源 挥发性有机物 半挥发性有机物 检测评价 

分 类 号:R123[医药卫生—环境卫生学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象