检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付必谦[1] 陈卫[1] 王磊 杨益民[3] 高武[1] 仲雨霞[1]
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学生命科学学院,北京100048 [2]北京市学院路中学,北京100088 [3]北京工商大学数理部,北京100037
出 处:《生物数学学报》2008年第4期668-676,共9页Journal of Biomathematics
摘 要:利用主成分分析、系统聚类分析和非参数检验,对采自北京地区的88只姬鼠标本(黑线姬鼠Apodemus agrarius除外)的10个形态分类指标进行了分析,以便确定出最具种间特异性的形态分类特征并给出定量判别标准.结果表明:除黑线姬鼠外,北京地区另有中华姬鼠(A.draco)和大林姬鼠(A.peninsulae)两种姬鼠;门齿孔后缘距上臼齿列前缘水平线的距离(x_9)、上颌M^1后内侧齿突向舌侧突出的程度(x_1)及其与第2横嵴内侧齿突的相对大小(x_2)是区分后两种姬鼠的最有效的形态分类指标;3个指标的种间界限大致为:中华姬鼠x_9<0.4mm, x_1≥0.2mm,x_2≥0.6;大林姬鼠x_9≥0.4mm,x_1<0.2mm,x_2<0.6.In this paper we tried to settle two problems: (1)Does Apodemus draco exist in Beijing areas, besides A. agrarius and A. peninsulae? (2)What are the significant morphological differences between A. draco and A. peninsulae from Beijing? Ten characteristics of skull, teeth and appearance of the 88 specimens of Apodemus collected from Beijing except A. agrarius were analyzed by principal component analysis, cluster analysis and nonparametric test for two independent samples. The results indicated that there is Apodemus draco in Beijing and the chief distinguishing characteristics between A. draco and A. peninsulae lay in: the distance between the posterior margin of the incisive foramina and the level of the anterior edge of the first molar (x9) ; the width of postero-internal lobe on the first upper molar (x1) and its ratio to that of the cusp in front of it (x2). These quantitative characteristics differed significantly and overlapped very little between A. draco and A. peninsulae. The two species could be successfully identified depending upon the following standards: x9 〈 0.4mm, x1 ≥ 0.2mm and x2 ≥ 0.6 for A. draco, while x9 ≥ 0.4mm, x1 〈 0.2mm and x2 〈 0.6 for A. peninsulae.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229