论政府干预市场和管制价格的边界——一则“观众诉影院侵犯选择权案”的经济学阐释  

An Analysis of the Boundary of Price Regulations and other Interventions from Government——An Economics Explanation on "the Suit Case of Consumer against Cinema for Options"

作　　者：汪淑珍[1] 许成安[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学文法学院,北京100083 [2]南京审计学院经济学院,江苏南京210019

出　　处：《财经理论与实践》2009年第2期119-123,共5页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics

摘　　要：消费者投诉商家"侵犯其选择权"等诸如此类的问题,反映了消费者对政府干预的期盼,直接表现为对政府管制市场价格的渴望。理论分析表明,政府以提供"禁止"之类"有益品"(merit goods)的方式来纠正人们不合理的偏好进而解决市场失灵问题,是市场经济条件下政府的重要职能之一。商家的行规戒律并非"不合理偏好",不属于政府干预或管制的范围。因此,发展市场经济应该更多地让价格发挥配置资源的作用;政府的价格管制边界应严格限定在市场失灵领域,如对垄断企业的价格及非垄断企业的卡特尔定价行为等进行管制。The suit cases of consumers against cinema for options violation have showed the expectations for the government interference market prices. Theories show that government rectifies con- sumers＇ unreasonable preferences to avoid market failure by providing merit goods such as ＂interdict＂, which is an important function of government. However, the guild regulations in business are not ＂unreasonable preferences＂, government regulations can＇t interference. It is important to allocate resources in market economy by prices. The behaviors of government interferencing prices can only happen at the place with market failure. Government intervention may be involved in price regulation of monopoly and Cartel.

关 键 词：政府干预 市场失灵 价格管制 消费选择权 偏好 

分 类 号：F407.9[经济管理—产业经济] F726.2