检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严治[1,2] 邓欢 杨军 胡玉莲[1] 刘敏[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院,四川成都610041 [2]四川省巴中市鸿福医院放射科,四川巴中636001 [3]四川省内江市公安局东兴区分局,四川内江641003 [4]四川省石棉县公安局,四川石棉625400
出 处:《华西医学》2009年第2期264-267,共4页West China Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:比较脑内血肿体积不同测量方法,为损伤程度鉴定提供更适用的依据。方法:将已知体积的模拟血肿经过CT扫描,用不同的测量方法测量其体积然后进行比较。结果:经统计学处理,CT定量、体视学法、尺量法测得的体积与模拟血肿体积无显著差异,多田法测出的体积与模拟血肿体积有显著差异。结论:在司法实践中,体视法为测定脑内血肿的最简便适用方法。Objective:To compare the measurements of the intracerebral hematoma's volume and then find out the most suitable method for medicolegel expertise. Methods: First the volume of the imitative intracranial hematoma was measured and then the imitative intracerebral hematoma was scanned by CT(computerized tomography) ,lastly the volumes were measured again through the different measurements. Results:Through the statistical treatment, the quantitative method of CT, stereological method and Chiliang's method were without significant deviation by comparision to actual volumes, but the Data's method ha the significant deviation. Conclusion: Stereological method is most suitable for the measurement of the intracerebral hematoma's volume in the practice of forensic medicine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188