检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周雨泽
机构地区:[1]中海炼化惠州炼油分公司,广东惠州516086
出 处:《河北化工》2009年第3期44-46,共3页Hebei Chemical Industry
摘 要:比较了加工含硫渣油的两种不同的典型组合工艺。结果表明,渣油加氢-催化裂化组合工艺虽然一次性投资和加工费用较高,但由于其液体产品收率高、产值高,使之经济效益反而较好,而且组合工艺在产品结构、产品质量以及环保方面都具有明显的优势。从长远看,组合工艺装置投资和加工成本都有下降的趋势,高原油价格对其也有利。因此渣油加氢-催化裂化组合工艺是加工含硫渣油的较佳选择。This paper compared two different typical combined processes in processing sour residual oil. The result showed that in spite of its higher one - off investments and process cost, the economic benefit of residual hydrotreating - catalytic cracking combined process is still better because of its higher liquid yield and higher production value. Furthermore, the predominance of its product quality, structure, environmental protection is evident. In the long run, the equip mental investments and process expenditures of combined process have a descendant trend, moreover, the high oil price is favorate too. So residue hydrotreating - catalytic cracking combined process is a good choose for processing sour residual oil.
分 类 号:TE624.41[石油与天然气工程—油气加工工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80