检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄泳[1] 李小溪[1] 赖新生[2] 邹燕齐[1] 吴俊贤[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学中医药学院针灸教研室,广东广州510515 [2]广州中医药大学针灸推拿学院经络原理研究室,广东广州510407
出 处:《河北中医》2009年第2期254-256,共3页Hebei Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助课题(编号:2006CB504505);国家自然科学基金重大研究计划课题(编号:90709027)
摘 要:目的运用功能性磁共振(fMRI)脑功能成像技术,研究支沟穴皮部浅刺与常规针刺对不同脑功能区的激活异同。方法8例青年志愿者分别接受支沟穴皮部浅刺与常规针刺的2次针刺刺激,并进行fMRI脑部扫描。统计皮部浅刺与常规针刺状态下脑部各感兴趣区(ROIs)的激活几率、激活点数和激活强度,并进行比较。结果支沟穴皮部浅刺与常规针刺,对左右不同脑区的激活几率、激活点数和激活强度比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但有趋势表明,常规针刺相对集中地激活对侧脑区,其激活点和强度都相对集中;皮部浅刺,左右两侧脑区均有激活,激活点较为分散,激活强度也相对较弱。结论支沟穴皮部浅刺与常规针刺对不同脑部功能区激活没有显著差异,有趋势表明,常规针刺对脑区的激活更加集中。Objective To study the activating effect on different cerebral functional regions induced by cutaneous stimulation and routine needling in Zhigou (SJ6) by fMRI. Methods Eight volunteers received 2 times stimulation of cutaneons or routine needling in SJ6, and received the cerebral fMRI scan under the different states. The cerebral activating rate, activating spots and activating strength of different ROIs were compared under the two different stimulating states. Resuits There were no obvious difference in cerebral activating rate, activating spots and activating strength of different ROIs ( P 〉 0.05), but there was a trend that routine needling mainly activated the opposite cerebral regions and the activating spots and the strength were concentrative, while cutaneous needling could activate bilateral cerebral functional regions and the distribution of the activating spots was scattering and the strength was weaker. Conclusion There was no obvious difference between cutaneous and routine needling in SJ6, but there was a trend that routine needling could intensively activate the cerebral functional regions.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R245.31[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28