检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌春华[1] 王光杰[1] 马家用[1] 陶岳多[1] 黄建安[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州医学院附属第一医院呼吸内科
出 处:《中华结核和呼吸杂志》1998年第5期284-286,共3页Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
摘 要:目的评价不同的材料和操作程序,对支气管动脉栓塞治疗咯血的远期疗效的影响。方法72例咯血患者,分组接受选择性支气管动脉双重栓塞和单纯明胶海绵栓塞治疗。29例患者选择支气管动脉双重栓塞时,首程采用明胶微粒(0.5mm×0.5mm)、高渗氯化钠和红霉素的混合物栓塞末梢血管,次程以明胶颗粒(1mm×1mm)栓塞主干及1~2级分支血管,43例患者选择单程明胶海绵栓塞治疗。结果两组患者经过治疗后及随访2~4.8年,止血治愈率和总有效率分别为:双重栓塞组83%、100%,单纯明胶海绵栓塞组61%、95%。两组病例止血治愈率相比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。Objective To investigate the long term effect of bronchial arterial embolization with different material and procedure on patients with hemoptysis. Method Seventy two cases were divided into two groups, one received the double embolization of bronchial artery, the other group used single gelfoam embolization.In double embolization group, the mixture containing gelfoam microspheres (0.5 mm × 0.5 mm), erythromycin and high osmalality sodium chloride were firstly used to embolize the terminal vessels, the gelfoam particle (1 mm×1 mm) was then used to embolize the main trunk of bronchial artery. Result After 2~4.8 years following up, it turned out that the cure rate and general effectiveness were : the double embolization group 83%,100% respectivly, the single gelfoam embolization group 61%, 95%. By comparison, there were significant difference on cure rate between these two groups( P <0.05). Conclusion The bronchial arterial double embolization will increase the long term effect obviously on patients with hemoptysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72