检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘朝国
机构地区:[1]四川省革命伤残军人医院
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2009年第3期99-100,共2页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的比较活血通腑与清热通腑治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效。方法将110例急性胰腺炎炎患者随机分成两组,治疗组62例在珏医抗炎补液禁食基础上配合中医活血通腑治疗,对照组48例在西医抗炎补液禁食基础上配合中药清热通腑治疗,并将两组治疗效果、疗程进行比较。结果治疗组治疗有效率93.2%,对照组治疗有效率88.7%,且治疗组疗程低于对照组。结论活血通腑法治疗急性胰腺炎效果明显优于清热通腑法。Object i ve Comparing the clinical efficacy of the chinese medicine HXTF method and the QRTF method.in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Methods Randomly dividing the 110 cases of acute pancreatitis into two groups,the first group,with 62 cases of patients,were treated with chinese medicine HXTF method in addition to conventional Western medicine as anti-inflammatory drug therapy, rehydration therapy and fasting treatment.the second group ,with 48 cases of patients, were treated with chinese medicine QRTF method in addition to conventional Western medicine as anti-inflammatory drug therapy, rehydration therapy and fasting treatment.Then comparing the clinical efficacy and the course of treatment of the two groups. Results The Efficiency of the first group treatment is 93.2%, the second group is 88.7%, And the course of the HXTF method is comlaarativelv short. Conc I us i on The clinical efficacy of the HXTF method is much better than the ORTF method.
分 类 号:R26[医药卫生—中医外科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.84.174