后格赖斯语用学意义划分模式研究  

Study on the Post-Gricean Pragmatic Models of Meaning Division

作　　者：姜涛[1,2] 张绍杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学,长春130024 [2]黑龙江大学,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《外语学刊》2009年第1期77-81,共5页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目“后格赖斯语用学研究”(07JA740012)阶段性成果

摘　　要：由于经典格赖斯会话含义理论将交际内容划分为所言和所含,导致了后格赖斯语用学关于语义学和语用学的界面之争。本文在系统阐述格赖斯对所言和所含的划分及其缺陷的基础上,着重分析后格赖斯语用学中5种意义划分模式即卡斯顿模式、利卡纳提模式、巴赫模式、列文森模式和雅兹寇尔特模式的区别,并指出各模式存在的问题。The making of a clear-cut division between what is said and what is implicated in the classic Gricean theory of conversational implicature directly leads to the heated debates on the boundary or interface issues between semantics and pragmatics. This article discusses Grice＇ s division and its flaws and then presents the five models proposed by post-Gricean pragmatists who attempt to address the above issues, including Carston＇ s Model, Recanati＇ s Model, Bach＇ s Model, Levinson＇ s Model and Jaszczolt＇ s Model, and finally, it points out the problems about the five models in post-Gricean pragmatics.

关 键 词：经典格赖斯会话含义理论 所言 所含 后格赖斯语用学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]