检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《延边大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第2期5-11,共7页Journal of Yanbian University:Social Science Edition
基 金:河北省哲学社会科学规划研究2006年度项目(200608010)
摘 要:目前,在理解马克思主义哲学变革的实质上实践论成为一种强势话语,即学术界大部分学者认同实践是马克思主义哲学变革的阿基米德点:一方面,实践论在反思与解构传统哲学教科书模式中确立,至今仍然受到物质本体论诘难;另一方面,实践论作为观点群内部存在诸多分歧,实践论是一个有待于被反思的问题域。其陷入困境的症结在于在一种不自觉的"不相容思维"中审视实践。合理的思路是把实践理解为一个过程,马克思主义以实践过程辩证法超越了唯物主义和唯心主义的对立。At present, Practice is becoming a dominating term when the essence of Marxism Philosophy is comprehended. Most scholars approve that Practice is the Archimedean point in the development of Marxism Philosophy. However, if Practice is viewed by an unconscious"incompatible thinking", the following problems will arise: the reflecting and deconstructing mode of Practice in traditional textbooks is still restrained by the ontology on one hand; on the other hand, there exist too many branches and arguments which need further exploration. The author argues herein that practice is a process; Marxism surpasses the confrontation between materialism and idealism by dialectics of practical process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249