Sirolimus-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Small Coronary Artery Lesions:Comparison between Cypher and Firebird Stent  

作　　者：徐波 李建军 杨跃进 陈纪林 乔树滨 马卫华 秦学文 姚明 刘海波 吴永健 袁晋青 陈珏 尤士杰 戴军 夏然 高润霖 

机构地区：[1]Department of Cardiology, Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100037, China [2]Department of Cardiology, Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China

出　　处：《South China Journal of Cardiology》2007年第1期1-7,共7页岭南心血管病杂志（英文版）

摘　　要：Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of firebird stent for the treatment of coronary de novo lesion compared with cypher stent. Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients with 156 lesions who underwent coronary cypher (n = 68 lesions) and firebird (n = 88 lesions) implantation, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed at the time of stent implantation and subsequently at 8 months post-stenting. Small vessel disease was defined as ≤2.5 mm of reference vessel diameter measured by QCA. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, thrombosis, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. Seven-month angiographic follow-up, the late loss was not different between the two groups (0.14 ± 0.38 mm vs 0.13 ± 0.17 mm, P > 0.05). Similarly, overall thrombosis rate were similar in both groups (1.5% vs 1.1%, P > 0.05). However, in-stent restenosis as well as in-segment restenosis rate were significantly higher in cypher group than that in firebird group (4.4% vs 0% and 19.1% vs 3.4%, P = 0.047 and P = 0.001 respectively). TLR was also higher in the cypher group (10.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.033) compared with firebird group. Conclusions In this small sample size, non-randomized study, the data indicated that implantation of firebird stent for the treatment of small coronary lesion showed more favorable results in respective of restenosis compared with cypher stent implantation. A multi-center, large-sample size, randomized study, therefore, may be warranted.Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of firebird stent for the treatment of coronary de novo lesion compared with cypher stent. Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients with 156 lesions who underwent coronary cypher (n = 68 lesions) and firebird (n = 88 lesions) implantation, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed at the time of stent implantation and subsequently at 8 months post-stenting. Small vessel disease was defined as ≤2.5 mm of reference vessel diameter measured by QCA. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, thrombosis, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. Seven-month angiographic follow-up, the late loss was not different between the two groups (0.14 ± 0.38 mm vs 0.13 ± 0.17 mm, P > 0.05). Similarly, overall thrombosis rate were similar in both groups (1.5% vs 1.1%, P > 0.05). However, in-stent restenosis as well as in-segment restenosis rate were significantly higher in cypher group than that in firebird group (4.4% vs 0% and 19.1% vs 3.4%, P = 0.047 and P = 0.001 respectively). TLR was also higher in the cypher group (10.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.033) compared with firebird group. Conclusions In this small sample size, non-randomized study, the data indicated that implantation of firebird stent for the treatment of small coronary lesion showed more favorable results in respective of restenosis compared with cypher stent implantation. A multi-center, large-sample size, randomized study, therefore, may be warranted.

关 键 词：Drug-eluting stent Coronary artery disease Angiography Restenosis 

分 类 号：R543[医药卫生—心血管疾病]