检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李顺英[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学外语系
出 处:《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》2007年第4期70-77,129,共9页中国应用语言学(英文)
基 金:This paper is one of the outcomes of the university project ( XB200349)
摘 要:Four samples were chosen by systematic sampling from the range-finders between 1987 and 2003 to test the range-finders’ representativeness of the scoring criteria of CET-4 compositions. The samples were analyzed from the perspectives of transitivity, modality, thematic structure and cohesion. Fisher's Exact Test from the SAS system was used to compare two-sidedly the correct rate and the constituent ratio of these functional usages between two neighboring levels. Statistical results indicate that it is the quality, not the quantity of these functional usages that distinguishes two neighboring levels. The range-finders can basically represent the abstract scoring criteria as far as the four functional systems are concerned. However, the validity of CET-4 writing needs to be improved.利用系统抽样法从1987至2003年的四级作文评分样卷中抽取4份样本,从及物性、情态、主位结构和衔接四方面分析样本,使用SAS统计软件的Fisher sExact Test双侧检验样本的相邻两档在使用上述功能系统的正确率和构成比两方面有无显著差异。统计结果表明,拉开相邻两档差距的是这些功能用法的质量,而不是其数量。就这四种功能系统而言,评分样卷基本能体现抽象的评分标准。然而,四级作文测试的效度有待提高。
关 键 词:CET-4 compositions range-finders functional analysis scoring quality
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.129.72