检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄建平[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《湖北警官学院学报》2009年第2期40-43,共4页Journal of Hubei University of Police
摘 要:DNA鉴定作为鉴定结论的一种,具有优于其它证据的客观性、可靠性和科学性,但这并不意味着,DNA鉴定就是完美无缺的"证据之王"。在我国的刑事司法领域中,DNA鉴定还存在着诸多的问题。我国不仅要完善相应立法和管理机制,更要在DNA鉴定采信等环节上建立相应标准,杜绝对DNA鉴定的盲目轻信。As an identification conclusion, problems of DNA evidence in the criminal judicial process and the issues involved are precisely need to be studied and discussed. DNA evidence has the priority of objectivity, scientificity and reliability, but it is not mean that DNA evidence is the "king of the evidence." In the field of criminal process, there are still many problems of DNA evidence. As a result, our country must not only improve the relevant legislation and regulatory mechanisms, but also establish appropriate standards to make the DNA evidence more reliable and put an end to the blind trust of the DNA identification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30