检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张莉[1] 匡湘红[1] 田汉文 杨新云[1] 范爱兰[1]
出 处:《四川生理科学杂志》1999年第2期29-31,共3页Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences
摘 要:本文比较研究了三种有代表性的β-内酰胺类抗生素氨苄西林、头孢唑啉和头孢呋辛对β-内酰胺酶的稳定性。结果表明三者中以头孢呋辛的酶水解率较低即对酶较为稳定;氨苄西林对酶的稳定性其次;而头孢唑啉的酶水解率较高即易被酶水解破坏而失去抗菌活性,但头孢唑啉添加舒巴坦(按1:1配比)后对酶稳定性明显提高。The aim of this study was to compare the stability to β-lactamase amony the three β-lactam antibioties which are used commonly in clinic i. e. Cefuroxime, Cefazolin and Ampicillin. 5 standard β-lactamases and 2 isolated clinical bacterial β-lactamases were used to determine the absolute rates of hydrolysis to the antibiotics by spectropho-tometric assay. The result showed that the hydrolysis rates of cefuroxime were lower than that of cefazolin and Ampicillin. While the hydrolysis rates of cefazolin/sulbactam (1:1) were lower than that of cefazolin alone. It was concluded that cefuroxime was the most stable one to β-lactamares amony the three antibiotics while cefazolin was easy to be damaged by β-lactamases. Sulbactam can increase the stability of cefazolin to β-laclamases, which is worth to study in detail.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233