合同形式的欠缺与治愈  

Deficiency of Legal Contract Form and Its Solution

作　　者：朱娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第2期50-55,共6页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省教育厅哲社课题(07SJD820006)

摘　　要：合同形式于合同的生效至关重要。在合同法的发展历史上,合同形式经历了由形式主义到形式自由再到形式主义复兴的发展路径,但形式主义的复兴与纯粹形式主义的内涵大相径庭。合同形式包括一般书面形式和特殊书面形式,对欠缺法定形式合同的效力,存在着"证据主义"与"要件主义"的评价模式的差别。对于采"要件主义"的合同,若其符合相应条件,则有必要通过一定方式对其效力予以补正。The form of contract is vital to its effectiveness. Contract form has experienced a route from externalism to liberalism and to the renaissance of externalism in legal history. However, the connotation of the renaissance of externalism differs from the early externalism. There are two different modes of judging the effeetiveness of contracts short of legal form： one is essentials doctrine, and the other is p proofs doctrine. As for the latter, it is necessary to restore its effectiveness in some ways if the contract ean meet some conditions.

关 键 词：合同效力 合同形式 要件主义 证据主义 

分 类 号：D913.01[政治法律—民商法学]